Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8813 (BOM)

MOHAMMAD RAFIQUE IBRAHIM TAMBE v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT

WP/3577/2026 · 2026-09-16

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

16-wp-3577-26.doc INGALE IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 3577 OF 2026 Mohammad Rafique Ibrahim Tambe ...Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra and ors. ...Respondents ... Mr. Akshay R. Kapadia, for the Petitioner. Mr. Suraj Gupte, AGP for the Respondent No.1-State. ... CORAM : MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, CJ. & ADVAIT M. SETHNA, J. DATE : 16th SEPTEMBER, 2026 P.C.: 1. The learned AGP for the Respondent No.1 on the instructions submits that the proceedings have been withdrawn under the Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of Street Vending) Act, 2014. A notice has been issued on the Respondents which has been responded and later on, final order has been already passed on 15/07/2026. The same is not challenged in the instant proceedings, even though the Petitioner has alternate efficacious remedy to challenge the same before appropriate forum. As such nothing survives in the matter, the Writ 1 PALLAVI MAHENDRA WARGAONKAR Digitally signed by PALLAVI MAHENDRA WARGAONKAR Date: 2026.09.17 21:28:57 +0530 16-wp-3577-26.doc Petition is devoid of merit and is liable to be dismissed. 2. Confronted with the situation, learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that liberty be granted to the Petitioner to withdraw this Petition with leave to institute a fresh proceedings in accordance with law. 3. With the aforesaid leave, the instant Writ Petition stands Dismissed as withdrawn. We clarify that we have not adverted on the merits of the matter. [ADVAIT M. SETHNA, J.] [CHIEF JUSTICE] 2