Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8811 (UTT)

BHUPINDER SINGH ARORA v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/836/2020 · 2026-07-22

Alok Mahra

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

UKHC010055112020 2026:UHC:6217 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPCRL/836/2020 Bhupinder Singh Arora --Petitioner Versus State Of Uttarakhand --Respondent Hon'ble Alok Mahra, J. Mr. Akash proxy counsel for Mr. Aditya Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. Mr. Rakesh Joshi, learned A.G.A. along with Mr. Manoj Bhatt, learned Brief Holder for the State. 3. Learned State Counsel would submit that during the pendency of the present writ petition, the charge-sheet has been submitted before the competent court. It is, therefore, contended that the relief sought in the writ petition no longer survives and the petition has consequently become infructuous. 4. In view of the above, the criminal writ petition has become infructuous and is accordingly dismissed. 5. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (Alok Mahra, J.) 22-07-2026 mamta MA MTA RANI Digitally signed by MAMTA RANI DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=6a812005bebfcf4 6f244f3e584af1449e430ef9 00bf09a6d67ebbd6426713 29b, postalCode=263001, st=Uttarakhand, serialNumber=5de1751a4f 1d9cabfd54852c9e68911c a8b66dd26690a191648ab5 d8dd004ef0, cn=MAMTA RANI Date: 2026.07.23 10:47:19 +05'30'