- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:11919 WP No. 4743 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 4743 OF 2022 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. SADANANDA S/O SMT. GIRIJA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, 2. SMT. DEVAKI D/O SMT. GIRIJA, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, 3. SMT .AMITHA D/O SMT. GIRIJA, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, 4. SRI. CHANDRASHEKAR S/O SMT. GIRIJA, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, 5. SRI. SUNIL S/O LATE VASANTHI, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, 6. SRI. SUDESH S/O LATE VASANTHI, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, 7. SRI. SANATH S/O LATE VASANTHI, Digitally signed by JUANITA THEJESWINI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:11919 WP No. 4743 of 2022 AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, 8. SRI. CHANDAPPA POOJARY S/O D.MARAPPA POOJARI, AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, ALL ARE RESIDING AT KELLARRAIKODI, POOJARY HOUSE, THIRUVAIL VILLAGE, VARMANJOOR POST, MANGALURU TALUK, D.K.DISTRICT - 575 028. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. ROOPESHA B, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER MANGALURU, D.K.DISTRICT - 575 004. 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER MANGALURU, D.K. DISTRICT - 575 004. 3. THE THASILDAR MANGALURU TALUK, MANGALURU, D.K.DISTRICT - 575 004. 4. SRI. MARIO PERES BHATT S/O GILBERT PHILIP PERIS BHATT, AGED 61 YEARS, RESIDING AT HOLIDAYIN, S.L.MATHIAS ROAD, FALNIR, MANGALURU, D.K.DISTRICT - 575 004. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. V. SESHU, HCGP FOR R1 TO R3; SRI. ABHISHEK MARLA, ADVOCATE FOR R4) - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:11919 WP No. 4743 of 2022 THIS W.P IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DTD.4.1.2022 PASSED BY THE R-1 IN CASE VIDE ANNEXURE-J AND THE ORDER PASSED BY THE R-2 DTD.30.10.2018 VIDE ANNEXURE-C AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo dated 24.02.2026 stating that in view of the orders passed by this Court in W.P.No.14613/2022, which was confirmed in Writ Appeal No.999/2022 and the subsequent order passed in W.P.No.3788/2025, this petition does not survive for consideration. 2. The memo is taken on record subject to all just exceptions. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of in terms of the memo. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE rv, Sl No.: 45