Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8808 (UTT)

BHOORA ALIAS ABHISHEK v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

BA2/100/2026 · 2026-07-21

Alok Mahra

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS UKHC010116982026 BA2/100/2026 Bhoora Alias Abhishek --Applicant Versus State Of Uttarakhand --Respondent Hon’ble Alok Mahra, J. Mr. Yogesh Upadhayay, Advocate for the applicant. 2. Mr. Dinesh Chauhan, A.G.A. for the State. 3. This second bail application has been moved by the applicant – Bhoora @ Abhishek, seeking regular bail in Case Crime/F.I.R. No. 209 of 2025, under Sections 109, 115(2), 126(2), 191(3), 117(2) and 351(3) of BNS, registered at Police Station I.T.I., District Udham Singh Nagar. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that all the co-accused, having similar role, have already been enlarged on bail by this Court. Learned counsel further submits that it is a case of parity and in case, the applicant is granted bail, he will not misuse the same and will furnish the bail surety as per the satisfaction of this Court. 5. Learned State Counsel, on instructions, admits the fact that all the co-accused, having similar role, have already been enlarged on bail by this Court. 6. Considering the submission of learned counsel for the parties and also considering the fact that all the co-accused, having similar role, have already been granted bail by this Court, without expressing any opinion as to the final merits of the case, this Court is of the view that applicant deserves bail at this stage. 7. The present bail application is allowed. 8. Let the applicant be released on bail, on executing personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each of like amount, to the satisfaction of Court concerned, subject the following conditions:- i) The applicant shall attend the trial Court regularly, and, he will not seek any unnecessary adjournment. ii) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of this case. iii) The applicant shall not leave India without any prior permission of the trial Court. 9. It is clarified that if the applicant misuses or violates any of the conditions, imposed upon him, the prosecution will be free to move the court for cancellation of bail. (Alok Mahra J.) 21.07.2026 Ujjwal