Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8808 (ALL)

SUNIL KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

WRIA/15469/2026 · 2026-09-23

Dinesh Pathak

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 15469 of 2026 Court No. - 32 HON'BLE DINESH PATHAK, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record on Board. 2. This writ petition has been filed, inter alia, seeking the following relief:- "Issue a writ, order or direction directing and commanding the respondent authorities to respondent authorities to pay the due arrears of the differences revises pension since 16.12.2016 up to 26.08.2020 in pursuant the fifth amendment 2016 in third amended of Rules of 2016 of U.P. Nagar panchayat Akendriyat Seva Nirvatti Labh, Niyamawali 1992 as soon as possible, within stipulated period of time, in the ends of justice." 3. Learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of respondents no.1 to 4 and Shri Saurabh Tiwari, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no.5 have contended that the grievance of the petitioner, as raised in the instant writ petition, can be more appropriately redressed by the Executive Officer, Nagar Panchayat, District Mainpuri (respondent no.5) and that they have no objection if a direction is issued for expeditious disposal of a fresh representation, to be moved by the present petitioner, within such stipulated period, as may be directed by this Court. 4. In this conspectus, as above, no useful purpose would be served Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Arun Kumar Pal, Yadvendra Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Saurabh Tiwari Sunil Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) by keeping this matter pending; therefore, this Court deems it appropriate to finally dispose of the present writ petition, without making any observation on the merits of the case, with liberty to the present petitioner to move a fresh representation with respect to his grievances, as raised in this petition, within a period of three weeks from today, along with a certified copy of this order and a self attested copy of the instant writ petition before the respondent no.5, who, in turn, shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of three months from the date of production of the same. 5. With the aforesaid direction, instant writ petition stands finally disposed of. September 24, 2026 VR WRIA No. 15469 of 2026 2 (Dinesh Pathak,J.) Digitally signed by :- VIBHA RATAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad