[2026:RJ-JP:23359] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6229/2026 Veersingh Meena S/o Shri Babulal, Aged About 42 Years, R/o Nangalbas, Police Station Raini, District Alwar (Raj.). (Presently In Sub Jail Rajgarh, District Alwar). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7018/2026 Vijay Kumar S/o Ramswaroop, R/o Rawatwada Nayawasi, Police Station Nadauti, District Karauli (Raj.) (At Present Confined At Central Jail Alwar). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Umesh Vyas Mr. Jiya Ur Rahman For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI CHIRANIA (V.J.) Order 18/06/2026 1. These misc. bail applications have been filed by the petitioners Veersingh Meena S/o Shri Babulal, Vijay Kumar S/o Ramswaroop, who were arrested by the police in connection with the FIR bearing No.133/2026 dated 04.04.2026 registered at Police Station Raini, District Alwar for the offences punishable under Sections 8, 21 NDPS Act, 1985. [2026:RJ-JP:23359] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-6229/2026] 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that the bail applications filed by the petitioners were rejected by the Learned Additional District & Sessions Judge, Rajgarh, District Alwar, vide order dated 17.04.2026, thereafter, the petitioners have preferred these bail applications under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. 3. Learned counsel submits that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in the present case. Learned counsel further submits that the contraband substance (smack) recovered from their possession is below the commercial quantity, i.e., 5.05 gms. Learned counsel further submits that police after completing the investigation, has filed the charge-sheet, no recovery is required to be made from the petitioners and trial will take long time. In view thereof, learned counsel prayed that the petitioners may be enlarged on bail. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor strongly opposes the bail applications. 5. After considering the fact that the charge-sheet has already been filed, trial will take sufficiently long time, nature of allegations, the petitioners are behind the bars since long and without commenting upon merits of the case, this Court is inclined to exercise its power under Section 483 B.N.S.S. and deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioners on bail. 6. Accordingly, the bail applications filed under Section 483 B.N.S.S. are allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioners Veersingh Meena S/o Shri Babulal, Vijay Kumar S/o Ramswaroop shall be released on bail, provided they executes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.1,00,000/-with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.50,000/- to the satisfaction of learned trial [2026:RJ-JP:23359] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-6229/2026] Court for their appearance before that Court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. The petitioners are further directed not to take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty. It is made clear that the observation as made by this Court in the bail applications will not affect the trial of the case. 7. It is further directed that in case, the petitioners are found to be involved in any case including NDPS Act within a period two years from the date of passing of this order, learned Public prosecutor shall file an application for cancellation of the bail. (RAVI CHIRANIA (V.J.)),J 56-57/RINCHU