[2026:RJ-JP:23198] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6778/2026 Hakamdeen Son of Shri Chhuttan, Aged About 25 Years, Resident of Bhainsdawat, Police Station Govindgarh, District Alwar (Rajasthan). (At Present Confined In Central Jail, Alwar) ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Girish Khandelwal Ms. Swati Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Kumar Gupta, PP Mr. Naresh Gupta, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIPIN GUPTA (V. J.) Order 15/06/2026 1. The present bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 against the order dated 22.04.2026, passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Laxmangarh, District Alwar, in Bail Application No.105/2026, whereby the bail application of the petitioner was rejected in connection with F.I.R. No.144/2026, Police Station Govindgarh, District Alwar for the offence under Sections 317(2), 317(4), 318(2), 318(4), 112(2), 61(2)(A) of BNS, 2023 and Section 66D of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 13.04.2026 and there is no criminal antecedent against the present petitioner except one complaint on the [2026:RJ-JP:23198] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-6778/2026] National Cyber Crime Reporting Portal and the total amount involved in the present case is Rs.77,287/-. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that there are no criminal antecedent for committing similar offences by the petitioner. The offences are triable by the Magistrate and the challan has already been filed. Moreover, trial is likely to take sufficient time to conclude. Therefore, he prays that the petitioner may be enlarged on bail. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor oppose the bail application. 5. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 6. Without commenting any opinion on merits of the case, considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioner and also the facts that the amount involved in the present case is Rs.77,287/-; there is no criminal antecedent of similar offence against the petitioner; the petitioner is in custody since 13.04.2026, and the challan has already been filed and trial will take long time to conclude and this Court deems it appropriate to enlarge the petitioner on bail. 7. Consequently, the bail application is allowed. It is ordered that the accused-petitioner namely Hakamdeen Son of Shri Chhuttan arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.144/2026, Police Station Govindgarh, District Alwar, shall be released on bail; provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/ (Rs. One Lakh Only) with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- (Rs. Fifty Thousand Only) each, to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before the said Court on all dates [2026:RJ-JP:23198] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-6778/2026] of hearing and as and when called upon to do so until completion of the trial, subject to the following conditions: (i) The petitioner shall not leave country without the permission of the Court; (ii) The petitioner shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused, or suspected, of the commission of which he is suspected; (iii) The petitioner shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence; and (iv) In the event the petitioner is found involved in any other cyber fraud case in the future, the prosecution shall be at liberty to move an appropriate application before the learned trial Court for cancellation of the bail granted herein. (BIPIN GUPTA (V. J.)),J 37/PRATEEK KUMAR