Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8803 (JHR)

ASHISH KUMAR SINGH v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./798/2026 · 2026-03-19

Deepak Roshan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:7577 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 798 of 2026 --------- Ashish Kumar Singh, aged about 21 years, son of Bhagwan Singh, resident of House No.34, Bhatia Basti, P.G. Path, P.O. and P.S. P.G. Path, Town Jamshedpur, District East Singhbhum. ....Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand. ....Opp. Party --------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN --------- For the Petitioner : Mr. R.S. Mazumdar, Sr.Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. Sunil Kumar Dubey, A.P.P. --------- 03/Dated:-19.03.2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The instant bail application has been preferred by the petitioner for grant of regular bail for the offences registered under Section 308(4), 308(5), 109, 351(2), 352, 61(2), 111, 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and under Sections 27 of the Arms Act. 3. Learned senior counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case and he has committed no offence as alleged in the F.I.R. He further submits that the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. and the same has been registered against other named and unknown co-accused persons. He further submits that nothing incriminating nor any fire arm has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner and the petitioner for no offence has been languishing in custody since 13.10.2025; as such, the petitioner may be enlarged on bail. He submits that the petitioner is ready to abide by every condition as imposed by this court. 4. Learned A.P.P. vehemently opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. 5. Having regard to the facts of the case and looking to the allegations made against this petitioner coupled with the fact that during interrogation it was found that the petitioner was one amongst the person who planned for threatening but not the executor and also the fact that in another case he has been granted bail; therefore, giving him a chance to reform, I am inclined to enlarge this petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dhanbad in connection with Rajganj P.S. Case No. 80 of 2025. 2026:JHHC:7577 2 6. It is made clear that this bail is subject to the conditions that the petitioner shall report to the local police station every 2nd Monday of each month and also submit his mobile number/s to the local police station and before going out of station, he shall inform the concerned local police station and he shall appear on each and every date before the learned trial court and he shall not threaten any witnesses and shall co-operate in trial and if any adverse report will come against this petitioner, learned trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail of this petitioner. (Deepak Roshan, J.) MARCH 19, 2026 vikas/- uploaded 19.03.2025