SHAHRUKH AYUB KURESHI v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.
WP/448/2026 · 2026-09-17
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 8802 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 8802 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
911-WP-448-2026 (CR).docx IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CR. WRIT PETITION NO. 448 OF 2026 Shahrukh Ayub Kureshi … Petitioner Versus The State Of Maharashtra And Ors … Respondent —————— Mr. Saurabh P. Tandale for the Petitioner. Mr. Nitin B. Patil, A.P.P. for the Respondents-State. —————— Coram : ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J. Date : 17th September 2026.
PER COURT :
1. By this Petition, the Petitioner has sought for the following substantive reliefs :
“B. This hon'ble court please to issuing writ of Certiorari or any other writ or order in the like nature, the impugned orders dated 20.02.2025 passed by the respondent no.3 in रमांक जवाबी/हदपार/एसआर/२४/
२०२४ may kindly be quashed and set aside and for that purpose issue necessary orders;
This hon'ble court please to Pending the hearing and final hearing of this Writ Petition, the effect, execution and implementation of the impugned orders dated 20.02.2025 passed
by
the
respondent
no.3
in रमांक osk 1 of
2
911-WP-448-2026 (CR).docx जवाबी/हदपार/एसआर/२४/
२०२४ may kindly be stayed and for that purpose issue necessary orders.”
2. Heard Mr. Saurabh Tandale, learned Advocate for the Petitioner and Mr. Nitin Patil, learned A.P.P. for the Respondents-State.
3. Mr. Nitin Patil, learned A.P.P. for the Respondents-State, on instructions, submits that the Petitioner had filed an Externment Appeal bearing No. 95 of 2025 before the Divisional Commissioner, Pune Division, Pune, in the month of May 2025. He submits that the said Appeal has been disposed of by the Divisional Commissioner, Pune Division, Pune.
4. Mr. Nitin Patil, learned A.P.P. for the Respondents-State, therefore, submits that this Petition is rendered infructuous.
5. In view of the statement made by Mr. Nitin Patil, learned A.P.P. for the Respondents-State, Mr. Saurabh Tandale, learned Advocate for the Petitioner states that this Petition be disposed of as infructuous.
6. In view of the above, Writ Petition No. 448 of 2026 is dismissed as infructuous.
[ ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J. ] osk 2 of
2 OMKAR SHIVAHAR KUMBHAKARN Digitally signed by OMKAR SHIVAHAR KUMBHAKARN Date: 2026.09.17 15:49:24 +0530