Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8801 (UTT)

MS ANNAPURNA ROLLING MILLS LIMITED v. GAJENDRA SINGH BUDIYAL

CLCON/205/2026 · 2026-07-22

Pankaj Purohit

Contempt Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

UKHC010067612026 2026:UHC:6225 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS CLCON/205/2026 Ms Annapurna Rolling Mills Limited --Petitioner Versus Gajendra Singh Budiyal --Respondent Hon'ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Suraj Shahi, learned Counsel i/b Mr. Siddhartha Singh, learned Counsel for the petitioner. 2. Mr. V.K. Kohli, learned Sr. Advocate assisted by Mr. Kanti Ram and Mr. D. Barthwal, learned Counsel for respondent no.2. 3. Learned Counsel for the parties are ad idem to the fact that the order dated 25.02.2026 passed by this Court in WPMS No.1606 of 2023 (M/s Annapurna Rolling Mills Ltd. v. UPCL and others) has been quashed and the matter has been remanded. 4. In such view of the matter, contempt petition does not survive. The same is, accordingly, dismissed as infructuous. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 22.07.2026 R.Dang