RAMESH YADAV @ SONU S/O LATE SHRI HANUMAN PRASAD v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/6806/2026 · 2026-06-16
Bipin Gupta V J
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 8800 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 8800 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:23250] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6806/2026 Ramesh Yadav @ Sonu S/o Late Shri Hanuman Prasad, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Amarpura, Nayagaon, Police Station Paniyala, District Kotputli-Behror. (At present confined to District Jail Kotputli). ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its P.P. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vinay Pal Yadav For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Kumar Gupta, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIPIN GUPTA (V. J.)
Order 16/06/2026
1. The present bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS, 2023 against the order dated 24.04.2026 passed by learned Session Judge, Kotputli, in Bail Application No.122/2026, whereby the bail application of the petitioner was rejected in connection with F.I.R. No.344/2025, Police Station Paniyala, District Kotputli-Behror for the offences under Sections 140(3), 110, 117(2), 118(1), 189(2), 115(2), 126(2) of the BNS.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is in custody since 14.04.2026 and has no criminal antecedents.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that there are two injuries, which have been held to be grevious in nature, caused by a blunt weapon and not on vital parts, with one injury on the hand and other on the leg. He also submits that challan in
[2026:RJ-JP:23250] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-6806/2026] the case has already been filed. He contends that no case under Section 110 of BNS, 2023 is made out against the petitioner. Additionally, he also submits that no report of any injury caused being dangerous to life is there on record. Challan has been filed, trial is likely to take sufficient time to conclude. Therefore, he prays that the petitioner may be enlarged on bail. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the bail application. 5. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 6. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, considering the fact that all other offences except the offence under Section 110 of BNS, 2023 are trial by Magistrate and the challan has already been filed and petitioner is in custody since 14.04.2026, this Court is of the opinion that the bail application filed by the petitioner deserves to be accepted. 7. Consequently, the bail application is allowed. It is ordered that the accused-petitioner - Ramesh Yadav @ Sonu S/o Late Shri Hanuman Prasad arrested in connection with F.I.R. No. 344/2025, Police Station Paniyala, District Kotputli-Behror, shall be released on bail; provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/ (Rs. One Lakh Only) with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- (Rs.
Fifty Thousand Only) each, to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so till the completion of the trial and with additional following conditions:-
[2026:RJ-JP:23250] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-6806/2026] (i) The petitioner shall not leave country without the permission of the Court; (ii) The petitioner shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which he is accused, or suspected, of the commission of which he is suspected; and (iii) The petitioner shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. (BIPIN GUPTA (V. J.)),J 24/PRATEEK KUMAR