1 2026:CGHC:18219 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCRC No. 1494 of 2026 Dhanaram Yadav S/o Matwar Yadav Aged About 54 Years R/o Saragaon, Fokatpara, Thana Saragaon, District Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh. ... Applicant versus State of Chhattisgarh Through P.S. Saragaon, District Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh. ... Non-Applicant For Applicant : Mr. Vikas Kumar Pandey, Advocate. For Non-Applicant/State : Ms. Ritika Verma, Panel Lawyer. Hon’ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Order on Board 21.04.2026 1. This is the first bail application filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for grant of regular bail to the applicant who has been arrested in connection with Crime No. 03/2026 registered at Police Station - Saragaon, District Janjgir-Champa (C.G.), for the offence punishable under Sections 34(2) of the Chhattisgarh Excise Act. 2. The prosecution’s case, in brief, is that based on secret information received from an informant, the police seized 10 litres of handmade liquor from the possession of the applicant. Subsequently, during the investigation, the police arrested the applicant for the aforesaid offence. PREETI KUMARI Digitally signed by PREETI KUMARI Date: 2026.04.22 13:38:06 +0530 2 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is further submitted that the alleged liquor was not seized from the possession of the applicant. He also submits that the applicant has three previous criminal antecedents, however, all such cases have already been disposed of and have been duly explained in paragraph No. 4(a) of the present bail application. Additionally, one criminal antecedent, pertaining to the Excise Act, is pending and has been explained through a covering memo. It is further submitted that the charge-sheet has already been filed in the present case and that the applicant has been in judicial custody since 07.01.2026. Counsel argues that under Section 34(2) of the C.G. Excise Act, the prescribed punishment ranges from a minimum of one year to a maximum of three years, and that the conclusion of the trial is likely to take a considerable amount of time. In light of the aforesaid circumstances, it is prayed that this Court may be pleased to grant regular bail to the applicant. 4. Learned counsel for the State/non-applicant opposes the bail application. She further submits that the charge-sheet has been filed. She further submitted that the criminal antecedents of the applicant has been explained in paragraph No. 4(a) of this bail application. 5. I have heard learned counsel appearing for the parties and perused the case diary. 6. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, the nature and gravity of the allegations levelled against the applicant, and the fact that the charge-sheet has been filed, further the criminal antecedents of the applicant has been explained in paragraph No. 4(a) of this bail application as well as through the covering memo, and the applicant has 3 been in custody since 07.01.2026, and that the conclusion of the trial is likely to take some time, this Court is of the view that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail in the present case. 7. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. Let the applicant - Dhanaram Yadav, involved in Crime No. 03/2026 registered at Police Station - Saragaon, District Janjgir-Champa (C.G.), for the offence punishable under Sections 34(2) of the Chhattisgarh Excise Act, be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties in the like sum to the satisfaction of the Court concerned with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law. (ii) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against him under Section 269 of BNS. (iii) In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence, proclamation under Section 84 of BNSS is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the Court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial 4 Court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law, under Section 209 of BNS. (iv) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial Court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 351 of BNSS. If in the opinion of the trial Court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial Court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law. 8. Office is directed to send a certified copy of this order to the trial Court for necessary information and compliance forthwith. - Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice Preeti