HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU Case: WP(C) No. 124/2026 Anil Koul ..... Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s) Through :- Mr. Azmat Ullah Parihar, Advocate Vs U.T. of J&K and Ors. .....Respondent(s) Through :- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE ORDER 30.01.2026 During the course of arguments, upon being confronted with the issue of maintainability of the instant petition, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks withdrawal of the instant petition with liberty to file a fresh representation before the Relief Commissioner for redressal of his grievance. The instant petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. However, dismissal of the writ petition shall not come in the way of the petitioner to agitate his cause before the Relief Commissioner. Although the Relief Commissioner has not been arrayed as a party, the petitioner is at liberty to file a representation before the said authority, who may accord consideration to the same strictly in accordance with law and as per rules. (WASIM SADIQ NARGAL) JUDGE JAMMU 30.01.2026 Mihul Sr. No. 26 Mihul Singh 2026.01.30 17:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document