( 2026:HHC:3494 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. : 1946 of 2026 Date of Decision : 19.02.2026 Rajnish Saini ...Petitioner Versus State of HP & Ors. ...Respondents Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma. Vacation Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Bodh Raj, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Sumit Sharma, Deputy Advocate General, for respondent No.1 to 3. Romesh Verma, Judge(oral) The petitioner has approached this Court for the grant of following relief; “That the impugned Annexure P/1, dated 17.02.2026, issued by the respondent No.2, may kindly be quashed and set-aside qua the petitioner(Sr. No.2).” 2. During the course of hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he shall be contented in case, he is permitted to make a representation to the 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? ( 2026:HHC:3494 ) respondents/authorities for the redressal of his grievances in time bound direction. 3. Without commenting upon the merits of the case, it is ordered that in case the petitioner makes a representation within two days from today, in that event, the respondents/authorities shall decide the same within a period of two weeks, thereafter, by passing a speaking order and the said order shall be communicated to the petitioner. 4. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed anything on the merits of the case and respondents are at liberty to take a decision strictly in accordance with the provisions of law. 5. Petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (Romesh Verma), Vacation Judge. 19.02.2026 (Ritu)