Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8799 (CAL)

RINKU SEKH @ RINKU SK @ RINKU PAN @ RINKU v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

CRM (NDPS)/1350/2025 · 2026-01-27

Tirthankar Ghosh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

27.01.2026 Serial no. 6 [G.S.D] CRM (NDPS) 1350 of 2025 In re : An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 in connection with PTN Case No. 113 of 2025 arising out of Kaliachak PS Case No. 167 of 2025 dated 05.02.2025 u/s 21(c)/27A/29 of the NDPS Act, 1985. -And- In the matter of : Rinku Sekh @ Rinku Sk @ Rinku Pan @ Rinku … … Petitioner(s) Md. Wasim Akram Ms. S. Parveen … for the Petitioner(s) Mr. Anupam Das Adhikari Mr. D. Das … for the State-respondent(s) Learned advocate for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been implicated only on the basis of statement of a co-accused and there is no recovery from the present petitioner. According to the learned advocate, the principal accused has already been granted bail. Learned advocate for the State, on the other hand, opposes the prayer for bail and submits that call data records are available. However, no money trail is available so far as the present petitioner is concerned. I have taken into account the factum of one Wasim Akram having been granted bail after a period of 10 months and the present petitioner who is in custody for four months. I also find that the case was registered on 05.02.2025. 2 Learned advocate for the State again submits that last date was fixed for consideration of charges. However, both the learned advocates are unable to apprise this court whether charges have already been framed or not. In the aforesaid circumstances, I direct the learned trial court to release the petitioner on bail after charges are framed on such terms and conditions as it deems fit and proper for ensuring appearance of the present petitioner in course of the trial. With the aforesaid observations, CRM(NDPS) 1350 of 2025 is disposed of. Pending application(s), if any, is also disposed of. Report submitted be kept with the record. Parties to act on a server copy of this order duly collected from the official website of the Hon’ble High Court, Calcutta. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties subject to compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.) 3