Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8797 (RAJ)

CHANDRA PRAKASH JAT S/O SHRI ATAR SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/6826/2026 · 2026-06-16

Ravi Chirania V J

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:23248] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6826/2026 Chandra Prakash Jat S/o Shri Atar Singh, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Purani Chawani, Dholpur, Thana Sadar Dholpur, District Dholpur (Raj.) (At Present Confined In District Jail Dholpur) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6827/2026 Bholaram S/o Natthilal, Aged About 68 Years, Resident Of Bataupura, Purana Sahar, Police Station Kotwali Dholpur, District Dholpur (Raj.) (At Present Confined In District Jail Dholpur) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dushyant Jain Mr. Himmat Singh Bikarwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP Mr. Virendra Agrawal with Ms. Anjali Assat HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI CHIRANIA (V.J.) Order 16/06/2026 1. The instant bail applications have been filed by the petitioners Chandra Prakash Jat S/o Shri Atar Singh and Bholaram S/o Natthilal, who were arrested by the police in connection with FIR bearing No.117/2026 dated 27.02.2026 registered at Police [2026:RJ-JP:23248] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-6826/2026] Station Kotwali, District Dholpur for offences punishable under Sections 61(2), 318(4), 336(3), 340(2), 229(1) and 248(a) of BNS, 2023, who were involved in filing of false claim case by showing that the alleged incident occurred by a vehicle, which was already in police custody at the time of the incident. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that the petitioners are behind the bars since 12.04.2026 in connection with the FIR which was registered in respect of the incident dated 30.03.2025. He also submits that no recovery is required to be made from the petitioners and the offences alleged are triable by Magistrate. In view thereof, he prayed that the petitioners may be enlarged on bail by this Court. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor strongly opposes the bail application. 4. This Court, considering the nature of the allegations, the fact that the charge-sheet has already been filed, petitioners are behind the bars from 12.04.2026 and the trial will take sufficiently long time to conlcude, without making any comments on the merits of the case, is inclined to enlarge the present petitioners on bail. 5. Accordingly, these bail applications filed under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioners Chandra Prakash Jat S/o Shri Atar Singh and Bholaram S/o Natthilal shall be released on bail, provided they execute a personal bond in a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned Trial Court for his appearance before that Court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the [2026:RJ-JP:23248] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-6826/2026] completion of the trial. The petitioners are further directed not to take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty. 6. It is made clear that the observation as made by this Court in the bail application will not affect the trial of the case. 7. In case the petitioners are found to be to be involved in any other case of similar nature. The learned Public Prosecutor shall file an application for cancellation of the bail. (RAVI CHIRANIA (V.J.)),J 16-17/Dushyant