Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8797 (JHR)

SMT TUSTABALA MAHATO v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND AND ORS

WPC/805/2014 · 2026-04-20

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:JHHC:11410] -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P(C) No. 805 of 2014 Smt. Tustabala Mahato, wife of Banshidhar Mahato, Resident of Village- Lawa, P.O.-Simagunda, P.S.- Nimdih, District-Saraikella Kharsawan. ..... … Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand. 2. The Rehabilitation Officer, Subarnarekha Project at P.O. & P.S.-Chandil, District- Saraikella, Kharsawan. 3. The Additional Director, Land Acquisition and Rehabilitation, Subarnarekha Project Bhawan at P.O. & P.S.-Adityapur, District- Kharsawan. Saraikella, 4. The Deputy Collector, Saraikella, Kharsawan. 5. The Secretary Department of Water Resources Govt. of Jharkhand, at Nepal House, at P.O. & P.S.-Doranda, District-Ranchi. ..... … Respondents -------- CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Chiranjiv Bhadauria, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Munna Lal Yadav, SC (L&C)-III ------ 13/ 20.04.2026 This matter has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India with a prayer to make available the separate vikas pustika and also provide rehabilitation facility to the petitioner, pursuant to the land acquisition. 2. Mr. Chiranjiv Bhadauria, learned counsel, on instruction of Mr. Rishu Ranjan, who is advocate on record, submits that in light of counter affidavit, filed on behalf of State, this writ petition has become infructuous. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the State also accepts the said submission. 4. In view of the above, this petition is dismissed as infructuous. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated:-20.04.2026 Amitesh/-