Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8795 (AP)

P.Purushotham Reddy, v. S.UDAY KUMAR

CRLRC/1250/2019 · 2026-08-23

Y Lakshmana Rao

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010405352019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] MONDAY, THE 24th DAY OF AUGUST 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1250/2019 Between: 1. P.PURUSHOTHAM REDDY,, S/O.P.GOVINDA REDDY AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, HINDU, RESIDING AT D.NO.9-81 CHITTOOR ROAD, DAMARAKUPPAM VILLAGE KUMMARAGUNTA POST, VEDURUKUPPAM MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. S UDAY KUMAR, S/O.LATE M.SHANMUGAM AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, HINDU, BUSINESS RESIDING AT D.NO.4-732, BOUND STREET GREAMSPET, CHITTOOR TOWN AND DISTRICT. 2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT AT AMARATHI. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. CH SIVA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) 2. The Court made the following: 2 ORDER Heard the learned Counsel for the Petitioner and the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor. Petitioner and Respondent No.1 are present. Sri Y.Mallikarjuna Reddy, learned Counsel is appointed as learned Mediator in this case and has submitted mediator’s report. In view of the mediator’s report, the Criminal Revision Case is disposed of as compromised. Consequently, the conviction and sentence passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate of I Class for Special Mobile Court, Chittoor, in C.C.No.44 of 2016, dated 14.06.2018, as confirmed in Crl.A.No.146 of 2018, dated 24.10.2019, by the learned VIII Additional District & Sessions Judge, Chittoor, are set aside, as a result, the Petitioner is acquitted under Section 320(8) of ‘the Cr.P.C.’ There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ Dr. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Dt: 24.08.2026 VTS