Dasari Ravindra Babu v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
WP/21399/2026 · 2026-08-30
Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 8794 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 8794 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010400182026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE 31 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION N BETWEEN:
1. DASARI RAVINDRA BABU, S/ AGRICULTURAL,EX DEVASTHANAM
R VEMPADU, JANARDHANAPURAM, PRAKASAM DISTRICT PIN CODE 523271. 2. YARRA GOPAL, S/ AGNCULTURAL,EX DEVASTHANAM R JANARDHNAPURAM,
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, , REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENT, AP SECRETARIAT, VELAPUDI,AMARAVATI PIN
2. THE COMMISSIONER OF ENDOWMENTS, GOLLAPUDI, VIJAYAWADA,NTR DIST
3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF ENDOWMENTS, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DIST
4. THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER E O, SRI VENUGOPALASWAMI DEVASTHANAM VEMPADU, DISTRICT-523271. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE 31st DAY OF AUGUST 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No. 21399/2026 RAVINDRA BABU, S/o. PAMULAIAH, AGE 47 YRS OCC AGRICULTURAL,EX-CHAIRMAN SRI VENUGOPALA SWAMI DEVASTHANAM
R/o.2-56, PONNALURU MANDALAM, JANARDHANAPURAM, PRAKASAM DISTRICT PIN YARRA GOPAL, S/o. SUBBARAYUDU, AGE 55 YRS AGNCULTURAL,EX-CHAIRMAN SRI VENUGOPALA SWAMI DEVASTHANAM R/o. VEMPADU, PONNALURU MANDAL , JANARDHNAPURAM, - PRAKASAM, 523271. ...PETITIONER(S) AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, , REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENT, AP SECRETARIAT, VELAPUDI,AMARAVATI PIN- 522238 THE COMMISSIONER OF ENDOWMENTS, GOLLAPUDI, VIJAYAWADA,NTR DIST-520501 NT COMMISSIONER OF ENDOWMENTS, PRAKASAM DIST-523271 THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER E O, SRI VENUGOPALASWAMI DEVASTHANAM VEMPADU, JANARDHANAPURAM,PRAKASAM
[3330] THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO AGE 47 YRS OCC:
CHAIRMAN SRI VENUGOPALA SWAMI 56, PONNALURU MANDALAM, JANARDHANAPURAM, PRAKASAM DISTRICT PIN SUBBARAYUDU, AGE 55 YRS, OCC: CHAIRMAN SRI VENUGOPALA SWAMI VEMPADU, PONNALURU MANDAL , ...PETITIONER(S) THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, , REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENT, AP THE COMMISSIONER OF ENDOWMENTS, GOLLAPUDI, NT COMMISSIONER OF ENDOWMENTS, THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER E O, SRI VENUGOPALASWAMI JANARDHANAPURAM,PRAKASAM
2
5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, PONNALURU MANDALAM, PRAKASAM DISTRICT PIN -523271. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, Order, or Direction to declare the action of Respondent No. 4 in abruptly stopping the construction of the compound wall with Commissioner's sarvashreyanidhi for Rs24,56,000/- and by village donation of the Sri Venugopalaswami Devasthanam VEMPADU, Ponnaluru Mandal ,Janardhnapuram, Prakasam District and to pass such other order or orders… Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. GUNDALA SIVA PRASADA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR ENDOWMENTS
2.
DEVI SUBHASHINI ANNE SC For Endowments The Court made the following:
3
ORDER:
The present Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following few lines:
“….to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, Order, or Direction to declare the action of Respondent No.4 in abruptly stopping the construction of the compound wall with Commissioner’s sarvashreyanidhi for Rs.24,56,000/- and by village donation of the Sri Venugopalaswami Devasthanam VEMPADU, Ponnaluru Mandal Janardhanapuram, Prakasam District and to pass such other order or orders…
2. The Writ Petition is filed aggrieved by the action of the respondent No.4 in stopping construction of the compound wall of the Sri Venugopalaswamy Temple.
3. The respondents have filed their counter affidavit and stated that the construction of compound wall and design of the Arch Gate, to suit the temple structure and Agama Sastra rules the Engineering Wing of the Endowments Department have to prepare precise estimates and designs that strictly align with sacred Agama Sastras. But some of the villagers constructed a bare compound wall with bricks without finalization of the designs and the same is semi-finished condition.
4. It is further asserted that the 2nd respondent Commissioner, Endowments Department, A.P. Vijayawada constituted a Trust Board to
4
the Respondent Temple in the month of April 2026 and the said trust board proposed to complete the compound wall and the Arch gate along with Vahanasala under donor scheme. Accordingly, proposals were submitted to the Engineering wing of the Endowments Department and plans and designs are yet to be received along with estimates. And the respondents are proposed to complete the compound wall Arch Gate and Vahanasala and the same are going to be taken up as per the designs approved by the Engineering Wing of the Endowments Department.
5. Without going into the merits of the case, the respondents are
directed to make an endeavour for completion of construction of the compound wall at the earliest possible time.
6. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. There shall be nor order as to costs.
As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in these writ petitions shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 31.08.2026 Harin
5
52 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
W.P.No. 21399 of 2026
Date: 31-08-2026
Harin