Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:3227
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
C.M.P. No. 111 of 2026
1. Banarash Prasad Rai, aged about 75 years, son of Late Prayag Prasad, Manjhiladih, Resident of P.O. Gohrangi, P.S. Giridih, District Giridih.
2. Chandra Shekhar Ray, aged about 78 years, son of Late Satya Narayan Rai, resident of Charghara, P.O. Balkanari, P.S. Taratand, District Giridih.
3. Suresh Chandra Singh, aged about 76 years, son of Late Awadh Bihari, resident of Tuktuko, P.O. Atka, P.S. Giridih, District Giridih.
4. Rameshwar Modi, aged about 77 years, son of Dwarika Modi, resident of Village Mandardih, P.O. Chapuyadih, P.S. Giridih, District Giridih
5. Renuka Devi, aged about 58 years, wife of Late Sridhar Singh.
6. Rahul Kumar, aged about 41 years.
7. Shailendra Kumar Singh, aged about 45 years. Both sons of Late. Sridhar Singh. All are residents of Sariya, P.O. and P.S. Sariya, District Giridih, Jharkhand.
… … Petitioners
Versus
1. The State of Jharkhand.
2. Jharkhand State Co-operative Bank Limited through its Chief Executive Officer namely Dr. Manoj Kumar son of not known to the petitioners having its office at Bazar Samiti Building, Itki Road, P.O. Hehal, P.S. Sukhdeonagar, District Ranchi.
… … Opp. Parties ---
CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY ---
For the Petitioners : Mr. Atanu Banerjee, Advocate
: Mr. Suman Kr. Ghosh, Advocate
For Opp. Party No. 2 : Mr. Abhinay Kumar, Advocate
---
04/06.02.2026
Learned counsel for the petitioners and opposite party no.2 are present.
2.
Learned counsel for the State is also present.
3. This civil miscellaneous petition has been filed for the following reliefs:
“That this civil miscellaneous petition is being filed on behalf of the above-named petitioners for issuance of an appropriate
order from this Hon'ble Court for payment to the petitioner nos. 1 to 4 of and petitioner no.5 the amount Rs. 2,44,119/-, Rs. 2,07,987/-, Rs. 2,21,248/-, Rs. 2,35,920/- and Rs. 1,15,227.50/- respectively which has been deposited by the opposite party no.2 by demand draft in favour of the Learned Registrar
2026:JHHC:3227
2
General, Jharkhand High Court, Ranchi in light of order dated 10.05.2023 passed in the said Contempt Case (Civil) No. 355 of 2023 and accordingly to the said extent the order dated 14.11.2025 passed in Contempt Case (Civil) No. 355 of 2023 may kindly be modified.”
4.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the contempt proceedings were dropped vide order dated 14.11.2025. So far as Contempt Case (civil) No. 355 of 2023 is concerned, the same was inter alia filed by the legal heirs of Sridhar Singh who was petitioner no. 4 in the writ petition. The learned counsel submits that the sons of widow of Sridhar Singh have no objection if the amount deposited before the learned Registrar General is released in favour of widow of Sridhar Singh namely, Renuka Devi.
5.
Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the amount has not been released by the office of the learned Registrar General in spite of order dated 14.11.2025 with respect to the other petitioners also.
6. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the LPAs mentioned in paragraph 3 of the order dated 14.11.2025 passed in Cont. Case (Civil) No. 795 of 2022 and analogous cases have all been dismissed. He submits that the petitioners are seeking the release of the amount as the connected LPAs, that is, LPA No. 569 of 2023 and 570 of 2023 have already been dismissed. So far as LPA No. 613 of 2023 is concerned, the same is still pending.
7. From the records of this case and the pleadings, it nowhere appears that the petitioners or the legal heirs of Sridhar Singh had approached the learned Registrar General for release of any amount.
8. Further, it is not in dispute from the side of the opposite parties that the amount has already been deposited before the learned Registrar General.
9. In such circumstances, this Court is of the view that it is for the petitioners to approach the learned Registrar General for release of the amount with their due identity and if the other legal heirs of Sridhar Singh have no objection for release of the amount in the name of the widow of Sridhar Singh namely, Renuka Devi, then an appropriate
2026:JHHC:3227
3
affidavit containing ‘no objection’ to such release is required to be filed before the learned Registrar General. If an appropriate affidavit is filed to the aforesaid effect and the learned Registrar General is otherwise satisfied, the amount relatable to Sridhar Singh be released in favour of Renuka Devi in terms of the earlier order passed by this court.
10. This civil miscellaneous petition is disposed of.
(Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.)
Date of order: 06.02.2026 Date of uploading:09/2/2026 Pankaj