Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8791 (ORI)

KRUSHNA HANTAL v. STATE OF ODISHA

BLAPL/1302/2026 · 2026-03-19

Gourishankar Satapathy

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

p. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK BLAPL No.1302 of 2026 Krushna Hantal … Petitioner Mr. A.R. Panda, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha … Opposite Party Mr. M.R. Patra, Addl. PP CORAM: JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY Order No. ORDER(ORAL):19.03.2026 01. 1. This is a bail application U/S.483 of the BNSS by the petitioner for grant of bail in connection with Nandapur Excise PR No.34 of 2025-26 corresponding to TR Case No.92 of 2025 pending in the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-Cum-Special Judge, Koraput, for commission of offence punishable U/S.20(b)(ii)(C) of the NDPS Act, on the main allegation of possessing 21Kgs 500Grams of Contraband Ganja. 2. Heard, Mr. Amulya Ratna Panda, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. M.R. Patra, learned Additional Public Prosecutor in the matter and perused the record. On being queried about the criminal antecedent of the petitioner, Mr. Panda volunteers to withhold bail to the petitioner, if he is found to have any criminal antecedent for commission of offence under NDPS Act. 3. Admittedly, the petitioner was taken into custody on 10.07.2025, but in the meantime, PR has already been submitted, however, the trial is yet to commence and there is no immediate prospect of trial. In the peculiar facts and circumstances, especially when no criminal antecedent of similar nature having been reported against the petitioner, but the possibility of human error in p. 2 weighing being not ruled out, the petitioner would be considered to have satisfied the conditions of Section 37 of NDPS Act, if he is not having any criminal antecedent of similar nature for commission of offences under NDPS Act. 4. For the reasons stated hereinabove and regard being had to the pre trial detention of the petitioner in custody, this Court without expressing any view on merit admits the petitioner to bail, but subject to verification of his criminal antecedent of similar nature for commission of offence under the NDPS Act. 5. Hence, the bail application of the petitioner stands allowed and the petitioner is allowed to go on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh) with two solvent sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Court in seisin of the case on such terms and conditions as deem fit and proper by it. In view of the specific submission as advanced for the petitioner, the benefit of this order shall not be extended to the petitioner, if he is found to have any criminal antecedent of similar nature for commission of offences under NDPS Act. 6. Accordingly, the BLAPL stands disposed of. A soft copy of this order be immediately communicated to the concerned Court, who shall afterwards communicate the same to the concerned Jail through e-mail for reference. (G. Satapathy) Judge Subhasmita Designation: Sr. Stenographer