Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 879 (JHR)

X v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

W.P.(Cr.)/799/2025 · 2026-01-08

Gautam Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:420 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W. P. (Cri) No. 799 of 2025 X .... .. ... Petitioner(s) Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand. 2. The Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of Jharkhand, Project Building, Post Office- Dhurwa, PS- Dhurwa, Distt :- Ranchi. 3. The Director General of Police, Ranchi, Post Office- Dhurwa, PS- Dhurwa, Distt :- Ranchi. 4. The Superintendent of Police, Medninagar, Distt:- Palamau. 5. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Medninagar, Distt:- Palamau. 6. The Officer-in-Charge, Pipratand, PO- Pipratand, PS- Pipratand, District- Palamau. .. ... ...Respondent(s) ........... CORAM :HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GAUTAM KUMAR CHOUDHARY ......... For the Petitioner (s) : Ms. Aulia Begam, Advocate For the State : Mrs. Nirupama, AC to SC.II …... 02/ 08.01.2026. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the instant Writ Petition was filed for giving direction for registration of the FIR. However, during pendency of the instant Writ Petition (Crl.), the FIR has already been registered. As such, the instant Writ Petition (Crl.) may be rendered as infructuous. Accordingly, the instant Writ Petition (Crl.) is dismissed as infructuous. (Gautam Kumar Choudhary, J.) Sandeep/ Uploaded 9.01.2026