Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8789 (MAD)

S.SURESH v. THE RESERVE BANK OF INDIA

WP/8811/2026 · 2026-03-06

M Dhandapani

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 8811 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 06-03-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI WP No. 8811 of 2026 S.Suresh S/o.Sundaram 5/66,Govindampalayam Thathaiyengarpatti(po) Namakkal Taluk and District-637 014 ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Reserve Bank Of India Regional office Fort Glacis,No.16 Rajaji Salai Chennai-600 001 2. The Regional Manager Indian Overseas Bank No.7/54,2nd floor Ideal Garden complex Junction Road Salem-636 004 3. The Branch Manager Indian Overseas Bank Valayapatti Branch Namakkal District-637405 4. The Police Inspector Cyber (CEN)crime police station APMC Yard Bagalkot-587103 ..Respondent(s) Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 3rd respondents to defreeze the https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 8811 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 5 petitioners bank account bearing No.255101000003738 maintained with Indian Overseas Bank, Valayapatti Branch,Namakkal District and to permit the petitioner to operate the said bank account For Petitioner(s): Mr.G.Paramasivam ORDER This Writ Petition has been filed seeking a direction to the third respondent to defreeze the petitioner’s bank account bearing No.255101000003738 maintained with Indian Overseas Bank, Valayapatti Branch, Namakkal District and to permit the petitioner to operate the said bank account. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. In view of the relief sought for by the petitioner, the Writ Petition is taken up for hearing at the admission stage itself. Since no adverse order is to be passed as against the respondents, notice to them is dispensed with. 3. It is the case of the petitioner that he is a Function and Program Organiser and the subject bank account is only a lawful business operational account and the same was freezed by the third respondent on the instructions of the fourth respondents without any valid reason. The respondent instead of freezing the disputed amount of Rs.43,413/- which was already lien-marked by the bank, the bank has defreezed his account, for which he made representations https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 8811 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 5 on 03.03.2025 & 14.11.2025 to the respondents 2, 3 & 4 respectively. However, there was no action on the part of the respondents and hence, the present Writ Petition. 4. In view of the limited prayer sought for by the petitioner in this Writ Petition, there shall be a direction to the third respondent to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 14.11.2025 and to pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 5. With the above direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. 06-03-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No DP https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 8811 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 5 To 1. The Reserve Bank Of India Regional office Fort Glacis,No.16 Rajaji Salai Chennai-600 001 2. The Regional Manager Indian Overseas Bank No.7/54,2nd floor Ideal Garden complex Junction Road Salem-636 004 3. The Branch Manager Indian Overseas Bank Valayapatti Branch Namakkal District-637405 4. The Police Inspector Cyber (CEN)crime police station APMC Yard Bagalkot-587103 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 8811 of 2026 __________ Page5 of 5 M.DHANDAPANI, J. DP WP No. 8811 of 2026 06-03-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis