[2026:RJ-JP:23360] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6289/2026 Pradeep Kumar Meena S/o Matadeen, R/o Sunari Thana Babai, Dist. Neemkathana Raj. (Accused At Presently Confined In Jhun- jhunu). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Its PP, Jhunjhunu Raj. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Omveer Singh Saini For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI CHIRANIA (V.J.) Order 18/06/2026 1. This misc. bail application has been filed by the petitioner Pradeep Kumar Meena S/o Matadeen, who was arrested by the police in connection with the FIR bearing No. 03/2024 dated 02.01.2024 registered at Police Station Gothda, District Jhunjhunu for the offence punishable under Section 379 I.P.C, 1860. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the bail application filed by the petitioner was rejected by the Learned Additional District and Sessions Judge-2 Jhunjhunu (Raj.) vide order dated 13.03.2026, thereafter, the petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of B.N.S.S, 2023. 3. Learned counsel submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. Learned counsel further submits that the police, after completing the investigation, has filed the charge-sheet on 01.07.2024 and the petitioner was arrested by [2026:RJ-JP:23360] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-6289/2026] the police on 21.05.2024. Learned counsel further submits that a period of more than two years has been passed since the date of arrest. It is further submitted that the other co-accused person namely Gourav Meena has already been enlarged on bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 15.01.2026 in S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.16692/2025. In view thereof, learned counsel prays that the petitioner may be enlarged on bail. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor strongly opposes the bail application, however, could not dispute the fact that the other co- accused has already been enlarged on bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court. 5. Considering the overall facts and circumstances of the present case, the charge-sheet has already been filed, trial will take sufficiently long time, nature of allegations as alleged, the petitioner is behind the bars since long and the other co-accused has already been enlarged on bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court, without commenting upon merits of the case, this Court is inclined to exercise its power under Section 483 B.N.S.S. and deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 6. Accordingly, the bail application filed under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner Pradeep Kumar Meena S/o Matadeen shall be released on bail, provided he executes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial Court for his appearance before that Court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. The petitioner [2026:RJ-JP:23360] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-6289/2026] is further directed not to take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty. It is made clear that the observation as made by this Court in the bail application will not affect the trial of the case. (RAVI CHIRANIA (V.J.)),J 58/RINCHU