Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
D/L38 20.01.2026 Bpg. rejected.
C.R.M. (NDPS) 87 of 2026
In Re: An application for Bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 filed in connection with Murshidabad Police Station Case No.472 of 2025 dated 21.05.2025 under Sections 20(b)(ii)(C)/29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985;
Barun Das Versus The State of West Bengal
Mr. Tapodip Gupta Mr. Suman Bhanja. …for the petitioner.
Mr. Antarikhya Basu Mr. Debanshu Ghorai. …for the State.
Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner claims innocence and submits that the address from which seizure was effected do not belong to the petitioner.
Learned advocate for the State, on the other hand, submits that the address appearing in the seizure list and the address referred to in the cause title completely matches with each other and there is report from the BLLRO in respect of the address of the present petitioner.
Having considered the quantum of seizure, I am of the view that the provision of Section 37 of the NDPS Act is attracted. As such, the prayer for bail in CRM (NDPS) 87 of 2026 is rejected.
All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.
2
Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance of all requisite formalities.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)