31-WP-375-2026.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 375 OF 2026 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 376 OF 2026 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 367 OF 2026 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 366 OF 2026 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 362 OF 2026 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 364 OF 2026 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 368 OF 2026 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 363 OF 2026 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 365 OF 2026 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 374 OF 2026 WITH WRIT PETITION (ST) NO. 552 OF 2026 WITH WRIT PETITION (ST) NO. 557 OF 2026 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 531 OF 2026 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 530 OF 2026 WITH WRIT PETITION (ST) NO. 560 OF 2026 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 532 OF 2026 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 528 OF 2026 WITH Gaikwad RD 1 of 3 31-WP-375-2026.doc WRIT PETITION NO. 529 OF 2026 WITH WRIT PETITION (ST) NO. 564 OF 2026 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 534 OF 2026 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 536 OF 2026 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1308 OF 2026 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1309 OF 2026 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1310 OF 2026 Janakalyan Nagari Co.operative Credit Society ...Petitioner. Versus The State of Maharashtra and Others ...Respondents. —————— Mr. Vishwajeet Mohite with Mr. Ketan Joshi & Mr. Vikram Kulkarni, for the Petitioner. Ms. Tejas J. Kapre, AGP for the Respondents-State. Mr. Tejpal Ingale with Ms. Radhali Kadam & Mr. Ulhas Chpire, for the Respondent No.2. Mr. Madhav Yashwant Tamhankar, for the Respondent No.4. —————— Coram : Sharmila U. Deshmukh & Neeraj P. Dhote, JJ. Date : September 16, 2026. P. C. : 1. The learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the petitions to avail the alternate remedy of appeal before the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Maharashtra (‘State Commission’). The learned counsel appearing for Gaikwad RD 2 of 3 31-WP-375-2026.doc the Respondent No.2-the original complainant before the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Sangli makes a statement that till the interim application proposed to be filed by the Petitioner- Bank before the State Commission, Mumbai in the proposed Appeal is decided, the proceedings before the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Sangli will be deferred. The statement made is accepted as an undertaking given to this Court. 2. In light of the above, the Petitions are disposed of, with liberty as prayed for. [Neeraj P. Dhote, J.] [Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J.] Gaikwad RD 3 of 3 RAJU DATTATRAYA GAIKWAD Digitally signed by RAJU DATTATRAYA GAIKWAD Date: 2026.09.16 20:12:55 +0530