NAVEEN KUMAR @ PRINCE S/O BHOOP SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/8427/2026 · 2026-06-16
Ravi Chirania V J
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 8783 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 8783 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:23278] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8428/2026 Deepak S/o Siyaram, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Seehi, Police Station Kumher, District Deeg. (At Present Confined In Central Jail Bharatpur). ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8427/2026 Naveen Kumar @ Prince S/o Bhoop Singh, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Madoni, Police Station Sewar, District Bharatpur. (At Present Confined In Central Jail Bharatpur). ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajeev Kumar Sogarwal Mr. Navankur Dubey For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, P.P.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI CHIRANIA (V.J.)
Order 16/06/2026
1. These criminal misc. bail applications have been filed by the petitioners Deepak S/o Siyaram & Naveen Kumar @ Prince S/o Bhoop Singh aged about 22 years, who were arrested by the police in connection with the FIR bearing No.693/2025 dated 21.10.2025 registered at Police Station Kumher, District Deeg for the offence punishable under Section 309(4) of B.N.S., 2023.
[2026:RJ-JP:23278] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-8428/2026]
2.
Learned counsel submits that the Police after investigation has filed the charge-sheet and no further interrogation is required.
Learned counsel further submits that the petitioners have no criminal antecedents of any nature in past. Learned counsel further submits that the other co-accused Nitin S/o Mahaveer, Jagat S/o Pratap Singh and Rohit S/o Omveer have already been enlarged on bail by the co-ordinate Bench of this Court as well by the learned Trial Court while allowing their respective bail applications. In view thereof, learned counsel prays that the petitioners be enlarged on bail.
3. In S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8427/2026 filed by the petitioner Naveen Kumar @ Prince, learned counsel submits that the petitioner has one criminal antecedent and he is on bail in that case.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor strongly oppose the bail applications.
5. Be that as it may.
6. This Court, after considering the fact that the Police after investigation has filed the charge-sheet, nature of allegations, petitioners are behind the bar since long, maintaining parity and after noting the overall facts and circumstances of the case, is inclined to exercise its power under Section 483 B.N.S.S. and deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioners on bail.
7. Accordingly, the bail applications filed under Section 483 B.N.S.S. are allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioners Deepak S/o Siyaram & Naveen Kumar @ Prince S/o Bhoop
[2026:RJ-JP:23278] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-8428/2026] Singh shall be released on bail, provided they execute a personal bond in a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- each with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial Court for their appearance before that Court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till completion of the trial.
8. The petitioners are further directed not to take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty. It is made clear that the observation as made by this Court in the bail applications will not affect the trial of the case.
9. It is further directed that in case, the petitioners are found to be involved in any case within two years from the date of passing of this order, learned Public prosecutor shall file an application for cancellation of the bail.
(RAVI CHIRANIA (V.J.)),J 40-41/Monika