Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8783 (AP)

MULI SRIKANTH v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/24047/2026 · 2026-08-24

Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010436522026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] TUESDAY, THE 25th DAY OF AUGUST 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 24047/2026 Between: 1. MULI SRIKANTH, S/O.SUBBA REDDY, OCC. CULTIVATION, R/O.ISUKAPALLI VILLAGE, IRLAPADU PANCHYATH, MARRIPADU MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT - 524312 ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY IT'S PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, ENDOWMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILADINGS, VELAGAPUDI, THULLURU MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT - 522238 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, O/O.SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT, ENDOWMENT DEPARTMENT, BESIDE DR.PENCHALAMMA HOSPITAL, GNT ROAD, NELLORE CITY, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT - 524001 3. THE TEMPLE INSPECTO, O/O. KAVALI DIVISION ENDOWMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, KAVALI TOWN AND MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT - 524201 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, MARRIPADU POLICE STATION, MARRIPADU MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT - 524312 ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of 2nd respondent in directing the petitioner through endorcement letter no nil/2026 dated 16.06.2026 by allowing all the villagers to participate in prayers in ramalayam temple situated at isukapalli village, irlapadu panchyath, marripadu mandal, spsr nellore district irrespective of their castes and community without considering the allegations made in the representation along with villagers dated 22.04.2026 is illegal, arbitary contary to maintain harmonious/peaceful atmosphere in the village by setting aside the same and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 22.04.2026 to grant separate slots to each community to offer prayers in ensuing sri krishna astami festival to be held on 04.09.2026 so as to maintain harmonious/peaceful atmosphere in the village besides article 14,19 and 21 of the constitution of India IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the 2nd respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 22.04.2026 for granting separate slots to each community to offer prayers in Ramalayam temple situated at isukapalii village, irlapadu panchyath, marripadu mandal, spsr nellore district in ensuring sri krishna astami festival to be held on 04.09.2026 pending desposal of main writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. TATA SINGAIAH GOUD Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. GP FOR ENDOWMENTS The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: 1. The present Writ Petition is filed by the petitioners, aggrieved by the action of respondent No.2 in issuing Endorsement Letter No.Nil/2026, dated 16.06.2026, permitting all the villagers to participate in the prayers at the Ramalayam Temple situated at Isukapalli Village, Irlapadu Panchayat, Marripadu Mandal, SPSR Nellore District. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Endowment appearing for the respondents. 3. The petitioner submitted a PGRS application dated 18.05.2026 to provide separate slots for offering prayers on the occasion of Sri Ramanavami Kalyanotsavam, including the three-day Thirunala, and to permit the villagers to participate in their respective slots without interfering with the prayers offered by others at the temple and the said application was not considered. Therefore, the Writ Petition is filed to direct the respondents to address the PGRS application dated 18.05.2026. 4. According to the respondents, the cause does not survive for further adjudication in the Writ Petition. 5. However, the present Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to consider and pass appropriate orders against the 4 petitioner’s representation dated 18.05.2026, and communicate the decision so taken to the petitioner within a period of one (01) week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications pending, if any, in this Writ Petition, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 25.08.2026 RMD 5 116 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO W.P.No. 24047 OF 2026 Date: 25-08-2026 RMD