Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8781 (UTT)

ADIL v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

ABA/302/2026 · 2026-07-22

Alok Mahra

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

UKHC010127052026 2026:UHC:6168 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS ABA/302/2026 Adil --Applicant Versus State Of Uttarakhand --Respondent Hon'ble Alok Mahra, J. Mr. Ankur Sharma and Mr. Rahul Kumar, learned counsel for the applicant. 2. Ms. Pushpa Bhatt, learned Addl. Advocate General along with Mr. S.C. Dumka, learned A.G.A. and Mr. Nikhil Bisht, learned Brief Holder for the State. 3. After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the applicant seeks permission to withdraw the present anticipatory bail application with liberty to avail appropriate remedy available under the law. 4. Permission is granted. 5. Anticipatory bail application is dismissed with liberty as above. (Alok Mahra, J.) 22-07-2026 mamta MAMTA RANI Digitally signed by MAMTA RANI DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=6a812005bebfcf46f244f3e584af1449e430ef 900bf09a6d67ebbd642671329b, postalCode=263001, st=Uttarakhand, serialNumber=5de1751a4f1d9cabfd54852c9e68911 ca8b66dd26690a191648ab5d8dd004ef0, cn=MAMTA RANI Date: 2026.07.23 10:42:11 +05'30'