[2026:RJ-JP:23261] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8663/2026 Sanjay Meena S/o Hanuman Meena, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Dungariya Ki Dhani, Village Badekhan, Police Station Mandawari, Lalsot, Dausa, At Present Tenant SMS Colony, Police Station Shipra Path, Jaipur. (Accused In Central Jail, Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jai Raj Tantia For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Kumar Gupta, PP. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIPIN GUPTA (V. J.) Order 16/06/2026 1. The present bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS, 2023 against the order dated 22.04.2026, passed by the learned Additional District and Session Judge No.3, Jaipur Metro- politan-I, in Bail Application No.56/2026, CIS No.715/2026, whereby the bail application of the petitioner was rejected in con- nection with F.I.R. No. 171/2026 registered at Police Station Shyam Nagar, Jaipur, for the offences under Section 318(4), 316(2), 61(2) of BNS, 2023. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there are no criminal antecedents against the petitioner of having committed any offence of a similar nature or otherwise in the past. He further submits that the main accused, namely Aamir Khan, has been en- larged on bail by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in S.B. Crimi- nal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6532/2026 vide order dated [2026:RJ-JP:23261] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-8663/2026] 26.05.2026. He also submits that the said co-accused had already refunded the entire amount to the complainant and that a com- promise has been entered into between the parties. He further submits that the case of the petitioner stands on a similar footing to that of Aamir Khan. He also submits that the offences are tri- able by the Magistrate and that the conclusion of the trial is likely to take a considerable amount of time. Therefore, he prays that the petitioner be enlarged on bail, particularly in view of the fact that the petitioner has been in custody since 20.04.2026. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the bail appli- cation. 4. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Public Pros- ecutor and perused the material available on record. 5. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case and having considered the submissions advanced as well as the fact that there are no criminal antecedents against the petitioner; that the main accused, namely Aamir Khan, has been enlarged on bail by a Coordinate Bench of this Court in S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6532/2026 dated 26.05.2026; that the said accused had already refunded the entire amount to the com- plainant and a compromise has been arrived at between the par- ties; that the case of the petitioner is not on a lesser footing than that of Aamir Khan; and that the offences are triable by the Mag- istrate and the trial is likely to take a considerable amount of time, this Court is of the opinion that the present bail application de- serves to be allowed. 6. Consequently, the present bail application is allowed. It is ordered that the petitioner namely-Sanjay Meena S/o Hanu- [2026:RJ-JP:23261] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-8663/2026] man Meena arrested in connection with F.I.R. No. 171/2026 reg- istered at Police Station Shyam Nagar, Jaipur, shall be released on bail; provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- (Ru- pees One Lakh Only) with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) each, subject to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before the said Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so until completion of the trial, subject to the following con- ditions: (i) The petitioner shall not leave country without the prior permission of the Court; (ii) The petitioner shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected to have committed; and (iii) The petitioner shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person ac- quainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing those facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence; and (iv) In the event the petitioner is found involved in any other cyber fraud case in the future, the prosecution shall be at liberty to move an appropriate application be- fore the learned Trial Court for cancellation of the bail granted herein. (BIPIN GUPTA (V. J.)),J Seema/67