M/S BRITANNIA INDUSTRIES LIMITED v. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
WP/16486/2025 · 2026-02-16
Anant Ramanath Hegde
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 8779 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 8779 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:9427 WP No. 16486 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE WRIT PETITION NO. 16486 OF 2025 (L-RES) BETWEEN:
M/S BRITANNIA INDUSTRIES LIMITED, A PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956, HAVING ONE OF ITS FACTORIES AT PLOT NO.23, BIDADI INDUSTRIAL AREA, BALAVEERANA HALLI, BIDADI HOBLI, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT-562109, REPRESENTED BY ITS CLUSTER HR-MANAGER, MR. PRASHANTH KUMAR SHETTY. …PETITIONER (BY SRI PRASHANTH B.K, ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF LABOUR, GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA, VIKASA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560001.
2.
BRITANNIA EMPLOYEES UNION, A TRADE UNION REGISTERED UNDER THE TRADE UNIONS ACT, 1926, HAVING ITS OFFICE AT NO.43, MIG, 2ND STAGE, 2ND FLOOR, KHB COLONY, BASAVESHWARANAGAR, BENGALURU-560079, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI L MURALIDHAR PESHWA, ADVOCATE FOR C/R2, SRI M RAJA KUMAR, AGA FOR R1)
Digitally signed by PRAMILA G V Location:
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:9427 WP No. 16486 of 2025
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER BEARING NO.LD 204 IDM 2025 DATED 15.05.2025 PASSED BY THE LEARNED 1ST RESPONDENT, (ANNEXURE -N), IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE
ORAL ORDER
This petition is filed assailing the order dated 15.05.2025 passed by the first respondent granting permission to prosecute the petitioner for violating the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ('Act, 1947').
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner-employer and the
learned counsel for the respondent No.2-Union jointly submit that the dispute is amicably settled. The joint memo is filed reporting settlement and the same is signed by the authorised signatory of the respondent No.2-Union.
3. The representatives of the petitioner and respondent No.2-Union are present.
4. The joint memo is accompanied by a memo of settlement under Section 12(3) of the Act, 1947 read with Section
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:9427 WP No. 16486 of 2025
18(3) of the Act, 1947 and Rule 59 of the Industrial Dispute (Karnataka) Rules, 1957.
5. It is submitted that the settlement is arrived at before the Deputy Labour Commissioner and the Conciliation Officer. It is submitted that in view of the settlement referred to above, the Union does not wish to prosecute the petitioner.
6. The settlement is accepted. Hence, the following:-
ORDER (i) Petition is disposed of in terms of the settlement. (ii) The impugned order dated 15.05.2025 passed by the first respondent stands quashed.
Sd/- (ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE) JUDGE
CHS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 72