Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8778 (KAR)

SMT NAGARATHNAMMA v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/19592/2025 · 2026-02-25

R Devdas

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:11614 WP No. 19592 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 19592 OF 2025 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: SMT. NAGARATHNAMMA W/O SRI. NAGARAJU, AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS, RESIDING AT YAMARE VILLAGE, SARJAPURA HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU-562 125. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. MANJUNATH V., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA MINISTRY OF REVENUE, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE-560 001. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT, KANDAYA BHAVAN, BANGALORE-560 009. 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER ANEKAL SUB-DIVISION, BENGALURU. 4. THE TAHSILDAR ANEKAL SUB-DIVISION, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT. Digitally signed by LAKSHMI T Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:11614 WP No. 19592 of 2025 5. THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER ANEKAL SUB-DIVISION, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT. 6. THE SECRETARY YEMARE GROUP VILLAGE PANCHAYATH, SARJAPURA HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. NAVYA SHEKHAR, AGA) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE WRIT OF MANDAMUS OR ORDER DIRECTION BY WAY OF MANDAMUS DIRECTING RESPONDENTS FROM BLOCKING THE ONLY ACCESS TO SCHEDULE PROPERTIES BELONGED TO THE PETITIONER BY WAY OF BLOCKING SY.NOS.43 AND 44, SITUATED AT YEMARE VILLAGE, SARJAPURA HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER On 11.02.2026 the following order was passed: “Finally, two weeks time is granted to the petitioner for compliance of office objections, failing which, the writ petition shall be listed on 25.02.2026 for dismissal.” - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:11614 WP No. 19592 of 2025 2. Office objections have not been complied with. Consequently, the writ petition stands dismissed for non- compliance of office objections. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE HB List No.: 2 Sl No.: 9