HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 38448 of 2026 Court No. - 4 HON'BLE KSHITIJ SHAILENDRA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents and Shri A.C. Srivastava, learned counsel for the Gaon Sabha. 2. Grievance of the petitioner is that despite the fact that an interim order dated 15.05.2026 has been passed by the Additional Commissioner in the appeal preferred by the petitioner, the private respondents are attempting to dispossess the petitioner and cause damage to the property in multiple ways and, therefore, prayer has been made to direct the respondents to pass orders on applications dated 23.06.2026, 30.06.2026 and 06.07.2026. 3. A perusal of the applications indicates that prayer has been made to police authorities to register FIR against the alleged wrongdoers. 4. This Court sitting in Writ-C arising out of revenue matters does not have jurisdiction to direct the police authorities to register FIR for which purpose the petitioner has other remedy available to him as per the provisions of criminal law. 5. As far as the stay aspect is concerned, a perusal of the interim order passed by the Additional Commissioner shows that though prayer for maintaining status quo was made by the petitioner, the appellate court stayed the effect and operation of the order/decree before it. 6. In case subsequent to passing of the said interim order, circumstances have given rise to a situation where a fresh stay order is required, it is Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Abhijit Mishra, Raj Kumari Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : Avinash Chandra Srivastava, C.S.C. Chandrapal Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 22 Others .....Respondent(s) always open for the petitioner to move appropriate application in the pending appeal. 7. With the aforesaid observations, the petition stands disposed of. September 23, 2026 AKShukla/- WRIC No. 38448 of 2026 2 (Kshitij Shailendra,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANIL KUMAR SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad