HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 28714 of 2026 Court No. - 69 HON'BLE AVNISH SAXENA, J. 1. Sri Satya Prakash Chaturvedi, learned counsel for the accused- applicant hands up the rejoinder affidavit. The same is taken on record. 1A. Heard Sri Chaturvedi, learned counsel for the accused-applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. The present bail application has been moved by the accused-applicant Ajay to enlarge him on bail in Case Crime No. 93 of 2026, under Sections 140(1), 3/5 BNS, P.S.- Aata, District- Jalaun, during the pendency of trial. 3. It is contended by learned counsel for the accused-applicant that the accused-applicant is named in F.I.R. dated 02.06.2026 lodged by the Smt. Priyanka with the allegation that the three named including the accused- applicant along with 3-4 anonymous persons had abducted her husband Rohit.It is alleged in the F.I.R. that the informant's husband was returning home from visiting market, when he was intercepted by the accused persons who abducted him. Further contended that there is money transaction between the parties, which led to the alleged abduction. Further contended that it was not the abduction, but the abductee is real relative of the accused-applicant. There was some unpaid money, which the abductee assured to pay, which he was not paying as such, he was accompanied him to Delhi. Further contended that out of the three persons, named in the F.I.R., the complicity of one of the accused Gultu, has not been found during investigation and he has not been charge sheeted. The charge sheet is submitted. The applicant has no criminal Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Satya Prakash Chaturvedi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Shashi Prakash Pandey Ajay .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) history. The applicant is in jail since 04.06.2026 and hence, the applicant seeks to be released on bail. 4. Learned A.G.A. for State has opposed the prayer for bail of the applicant, but could not dispute the aforesaid facts. 5. This Court has taken into consideration the rival submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 6. Considered the role of accused-applicant and it is a no injury case. 7. Hence, without touching merit of the case, the bail application is allowed. 8. The accused/applicant be released on bail in the aforesaid case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of court concerned in view of observation made by the Supreme Court in its dictums of Girish Gandhi Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh [(2024) 10 SCC 674] and Policy Strategy for grant of bail in re [(2024)10SCC 685]. 9. The accused-applicant shall cooperate in judicial process for fair and speedy disposal. September 24, 2026 Shivangi BAIL No. 28714 of 2026 2 (Avnish Saxena,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHIVANGI YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad