SANGAM PASWAN v. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 2 OTHERS
CRLP/23029/2026 · 2026-09-22
Mayur Jain Jt Registrar J Listing, Tarun Saxena
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 8771 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 8771 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 23029 of 2026 Court No. - 48 HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J.
HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J.
1. The instant writ petition has been filed seeking following main reliefs:-
"(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned First Information Report dated 05.07.2025, registered as Case Crime No.357 of 2025, Under Section 2(b)(i) and 3(1) U.P. Gangster and AntiSocial Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 Police Station-Kotwali, District- Maharajganj. (ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondent nos. 2 & 3 not to arrest the Petitioner in pursuance of the impugned First Information Report dated 05.07.2025, registered as Case Crime No.357 of 2025, Under Section 2(b)(i) and 3(1) U.P. Gangster and AntiSocial Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 Police Station-Kotwali, District- Maharajganj."
2. Learned A.G.A. appearing on behalf of State-respondents has submitted that after completion of investigation, charge-sheet has been forwarded on 01.07.2026 before the court concerned.
3. At this juncture, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted and prayed that the instant writ petition may be disposed of in the light of the statement given by learned A.G.A. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mahesh Kumar Sahani, Narendra Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Sangam Paswan .....Petitioner(s) State Of Uttar Pradesh And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)
4. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, Mr. K.P. Pathak, learned A.G.A. appearing on behalf of the State- respondents and perused the material on record.
5. Taking into consideration the submissions advanced by learned counsel for the parties and the fact that charge-sheet has already been forwarded, we do not find any good reason to keep this petition pending for further adjudication.
6. In view of the above, the instant writ petition is dismissed. September 23, 2026 Saurabh CRLP No. 23029 of 2026 2 (Tarun Saxena,J.) (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- SAURABH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad