Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8769 (RAJ)

GOLU S/O HANSRAJ v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/5033/2026 · 2026-06-08

Bipin Gupta V J

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:23022] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5033/2026 Golu S/o Hansraj, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Bharja Nadi, Police Station Malarna Doongar, District Sawai Madhopur (Rajasthan) (Currently In District Jail, Sawai Madhopur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Harendra Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, Addl. G.A. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIPIN GUPTA (V. J.) Judgment / Order 08/06/2026 1. The present bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 against the order dated 16.03.2026 passed by the learned Special Judge, SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities), Act, Sawai Madhopur, in Bail Application No.70/2026, whereby the bail application of the petitioner was rejected in connection with F.I.R. No.56/2026, Police Station Malarna Dungar, District Sawai Madhopur for the offences under Sections 318(4), 319(2), 316(2), 336(3), 338, 340(2) of BNS 2023, Section 66C and 66D of the Information Technology Act, 2000 and Section 13 of the Rajasthan Public Gambling Ordinance, 1949. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there are only two complaints against the present petitioner on the National Cyber Crime Reporting Portal, and the total amount involved is approximately Rs.38,000/-. [2026:RJ-JP:23022] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-5033/2026] 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the challan in the case has already been filed. Moreover, the conclusion of trial will take sufficiently long time and even the offences are triable by a Magistrate, therefore, he prays that the petitioner may be enlarged on bail as the accused is in custody since 10.03.2026. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the bail application. 5. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 6. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case and upon a consideration of the arguments advanced, this Court is of the opinion that the bail application filed by the petitioner deserves to be accepted. 7. Consequently, the bail application is allowed. It is ordered that the accused-petitioner namely Golu S/o Hansraj arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.56/2026, Police Station Malarna Dungar, District Sawai Madhopur, shall be released on bail; provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.1,50,000/ (Rs. One Lakh Fifty Thousand Only) with two sureties of Rs. 25,000/- (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before the said Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so until completion of the trial, subject to the following conditions: (i) The petitioner shall not leave country without the permission of the Court; (ii) The petitioner shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused, or suspected, of the commission of which he is suspected; [2026:RJ-JP:23022] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-5033/2026] (iii) The petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence; and (iv) In the event the petitioner is found involved in any other cyber fraud case in the future, the prosecution shall be at liberty to move an appropriate application before the learned trial Court for cancellation of the bail granted herein. (BIPIN GUPTA (V. J.)),J 1/JUBIN