Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8768 (BOM)

SAU KAMAL GANGADHAR LANDGE v. WALU RAMJI PANSARE

IA/44/2026 · 2026-09-16

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Renuka Thakur 13-IA-44-2026.docx IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 44 OF 2026 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 477 OF 2007 Sau Kamal Gangadhar Landge ...Applicant V/s. Walu Ramji Pansare ...Respondent ________________ Mr. A. S. Ramesan for Applicant/Appellant. ________________ CORAM: SANDEEP V. MARNE, J. DATED: 16 SEPTEMBER 2026. P.C.: 1) Interim Application is filed seeking restoration of the Appeal which is dismissed for non prosecution by order dated 16 July 2025. The Appeal appears to have been admitted on 14 January 2008. It appears that despite being duly served, none had appeared on behalf of the Respondents in the Appeal. With a view to afford an opportunity to the Appellant to prosecute the Appeal on merits, an opportunity needs to be granted by restoring the Appeal. However, for negligent conduct of the Appellant, some costs are required to be imposed while restoring the Appeal. Page No. 1 of 2 16 SEPTEMBER 2026 2026:BHC-AS:37973 Renuka Thakur 13-IA-44-2026.docx 2) The Appeal is accordingly restored by recalling the order dated 16 July 2025. The Appellant shall pay costs of Rs. 5,000/- to Kirtikar Law Library within a period of four weeks. Payment of costs shall be condition precedent for restoration of the Appeal. If costs are not paid within the stipulated time, the Appeal shall continue to remain dismissed. 3) Interim Application is allowed and disposed of in above terms. [SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.] Page No. 2 of 2 16 SEPTEMBER 2026 Signed by: Renuka S Thakur Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 17/09/2026 15:34:59