HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 2278 of 2026 Court No. - 29 HON'BLE SIDDHARTHA VARMA, J. HON'BLE KUNAL RAVI SINGH, J. 1. Upon a definite question being asked as to in what manner the petitioner is representing the aggrieved public, learned counsel for the petitioner prays that the writ petition be dismissed as not pressed with a liberty to file a fresh petition. 2. Learned Standing Counsel for the State has no objection to the dismissal of the writ petition as not pressed. 3. The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed as not pressed with the liberty aforeprayed. September 23, 2026 M.S. Ansari Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ashok Kumar Pandey, Virendra Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I., Arjun Singh, Komal Mehrotra (Kunal Ravi Singh,J.) (Siddhartha Varma,J.) Sandeep Titoriya .....Petitioner(s) Union Of India And 8 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MOHD SAQIB ANSARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad