1 2026:CGHC:9915 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 842 of 2026 Santosh Kumar Mishra S/o Late Shri Rb Mishra Aged About 48 Years R/o Nandi Chowk, Vegetable Market, Tikrapara, District - Raipur, Chhattisgarh. General Attor- ney - For Sangeeta Mishra And Ranjeeta Pandey. --- Petitioner versus 1 - The Zone Commissioner Municipal Corporation Raipur Zone No. 1 Near Water Tank, Santoshi Nagar, Khamatarai, Raipur, District - Raipur, Chhattisgarh. --- Respondent For Petitioner : Mr. Raman Mishra, Adv. through VC For Respondent : Mr. Pankaj Agrawal, Adv. Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi Order On Board 25-2-2026 1 The petitioner has preferred this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking following relief(s):- 10.1 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, particularly in the nature of Mandamus, directing the respondent authority to forthwith supply certified copies of all documents sought by AVANISH KUMAR PATHAK Digitally signed by AVANISH KUMAR PATHAK Date: 2026.02.28 10:28:40 +0530 2 the petitioner vide application dated 09.02.2026, including action taken report on complaint dated 21.11.2025 and 09.01.2026, records relating to alleged any building permission/map and applicable building Permission by-laws, within a time bound period as may be fixed by this Hon'ble Court. 10.2 That this Hon'ble Court may kindly direct the respondent to produce the entire original record/file pertaining to the complaint and construction permission, if any, before this Hon'ble Court and further direct that no further construction activity be permitted or validated over the disputed land during decision of the petitioner's Application Cum Complaint ie. Annexure P-1, P-2, P-3 so as to protect the subject matter of the dispute and prevent irreparable injury to the petitioner.” 2 After arguing for some times, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition. 3 Prayer is not opposed by learned counsel for respondent. 4 Petitioner is permitted to withdraw this writ petition. 5 This writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Pending interlocutory application(s), if any, stands disposed of. Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Judge pathak