SRI TAMAL ROY CHOWDHURY v. SRI PINTU MAHATO, CHAIRMAN, BAIDYABATI MUNICIPALITY
CPAN/308/2024 · 2026-03-05
Amrita Sinha
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 8766 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 8766 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
05-03-2026 Item no.52 Subrata Bhattacharyya AR(C) In the High Court at Calcutta Special Civil Jurisdiction Appellate Side CPAN No.308 of 2024 Tamal Roy Chowdhury -vs- Pintu Mahato & Anr. arising out of WPA No.13076 of 2023 Mr. Partha Sarkar Mr. Abhijit Basu Ms. Megha Sarkar …for the petitioner Mr. Phatick Chandra Das Ms. Soma Chowdhury Bandhu Mr. Anurg Chatterjee …for the municipality Mr. Bhaskar Prasad Vaisya, AGP Mr. Nilay Baran Mondal …for DPPG
1. Learned counsels for the petitioner and the municipality both submit, upon instructions, that the terminal dues of the petitioner as regards pension and gratuity have already been paid. The petitioner has further grievance with regard to the arrear salary.
2. On a perusal of the order from which the instant contempt has arisen, it appears that direction was passed only for payment of the pension and gratuity amount and that there was no mention as regards the arrear salary dues of the petitioner.
3. In view of the above, no relief can be given to the petitioner in respect of the dues of arrear salary. The contempt application stands disposed of.
4. It will be open for the petitioner to file fresh petition on the fresh cause of action, if so advised.
5. All parties are to act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.
6. Certified copy of this order, if applied for, shall be made available to the parties. [Amrita Sinha, J]
2