Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8766 (ALL)

DEEPAK KUMAR AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P.

NABAIL/8939/2026 · 2026-09-23

Rajiv Lochan Shukla

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 8939 of 2026 Court No. - 71 HON'BLE RAJIV LOCHAN SHUKLA, J. 1. After some arguments, Learned counsel for the applicants prays that the applicants may be permitted to approach the concerned Court for seeking regular bail. He further prays that for a short time, the interest of the applicants may be protected. 2. The Learned AGA and Shri Hari Narayan Singh, Learned counsel for the informant have no objection to the said prayer. 3. Taking into account the submissions made by the Learned counsel for the parties, it is directed that in case the applicants appears before the Court concerned within a period of four weeks from today and applies for bail in Case Crime No.345 of 2026, under Sections 109(1), 351(3), 190, 191(3), 117(2), 115(2), 191(2), 324(2), 333, 352 BNS, Police Station Dhan Ghata, District Sant Kabir Nagar, their application for bail shall be considered and disposed of expeditiously, in accordance with the law, without being influenced by any observations made by the concerned Court while rejecting the anticipatory bail application of the applicants. 4. For a period of four weeks from today, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants in the aforesaid case. 5. With the aforesaid observations/directions, this application stands disposed of. September 24, 2026 A. Pandey Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Jitendra Singh, Vipin Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Hari Narayan Singh (Rajiv Lochan Shukla,J.) Deepak Kumar And Another .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- ANAND PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad