IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30807 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-564 Year-2025 Thana- BANJARIA District- East Champaran ====================================================== Ramayan sahani son of Late Binda sahani Resident of Village- Bherihari Ps -sugauli District- East Champaran Bihar ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tiwari, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mrs. Pronoti Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 2 06-05-2026 Heard Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mrs. Pronoti Singh, learned APP for the State. 2. Petitioner seeks bail, who is in custody since 17.01.2026, in connection with Banjariya P.S. Case No. 564 of 2025, F.I.R. dated 05.11.2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 274, 275 of the B.N.S. and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Amendment Act, 2022. 3. Recovery is of 100 litres of country made liquor. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. He further submits that it appears from the F.I.R. as well as seizure list that recovery has been made from the motorcycle in question and petitioner is not the owner of the motorcycle in question and he has no concern at all with the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30807 of 2026(2) dt.06-05-2026 2/3 alleged recovery of illicit liquor and the name of the petitioner has been transpired on the basis of dicalosure made by local choukidar and he has stated that the petitioner was escaped from the place of occurrence. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that except the aforesaid, nothing has come during investigation to suggest the involvement of the petitioner in the present occurrence. He further submits that the police after investigation submitted chargesheet against the petitioner and the petitioner is in custody since 17.01.2026. 5. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner and submits that the petitioner carries five more cases other than the present one but fairly submits on the basis of paragraph-3 of the bail petition that the petitioner is on bail in the pending matters. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Exclusive Special Excise Court No. 1, Civil Court, East Champaran, Motihari in connection with Banjariya P.S. Case No. 564 of 2025, subject to the following conditions :- Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30807 of 2026(2) dt.06-05-2026 3/3 (1) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below. (2) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witness, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail. (3) And, further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage, it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedents, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification. Ibrar//- (Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) U T