Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8760 (PNJ)

SUNEHA RANI AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CRWP/6925/2025 · 2026-04-16

Aman Chaudhary

Public Interest Litigationbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

             !"#"$  $  %$! !&'#"$ (#         $ Mr. Harshdeep Singh, Advocate, for Mr. Lupil Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Jasjit Singh, DAG, Punjab Mr. Manu Loona, Advocate, for respondents No.6 to 8. ))))         Learned State counsel, on instructions from ASI Nirmal Singh, submits that petitioner No.1, 16 year old, is residing with her parents, while there is an FIR registered against petitioner No.2 at the behest of respondent No.4-Lakhwinder Singh, in view of which, learned counsel for the petitioners does not press the present petition. 2. Ordered accordingly.         !"!   #"  ""$(*+ ,-. ""$$($'/ ,-. DINESH 2026.04.17 17:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document