UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND OTHERS (ENTREPRENEURSHIP DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE) v. M/S TARMAC ROADS ROOF BUILDERS
LPA/59/2026 · 2026-04-27
Sanjay Parihar, Sanjeev Kumar
Writ Petition (Civil)body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 876 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 876 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Serial No. 01 REGULAR CAUSE LIST
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT SRINAGAR LPA 59/2026 In [WP(C) 830/2023] Union Territory of J&K and Ors. …Appellant(s) Through: Mr. Mohd Younis Hafiz, Assisting Counsel Vs. M/S Tarmac Roads Roof Builders ...Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Syed Faisal Qadri, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Sikander Hayat Khan, Advocate
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR, JUDGE.
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PARIHAR, JUDGE.
ORDER 27.04.2026
01. Impugned in this intra-court appeal is an interlocutory
order dated 11.02.2026 passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court [“the writ Court”] in WP(C) No. 830/2023 titled “M/S Tarmac Roads Roof Builders Vs. Union Territory of J&K and Ors.”, whereby the writ Court has directed the appellants herein to deposit an amount of Rs. 1,46,05,785/- before the Registrar Judicial of this Court within a period of six weeks.
02. The impugned order has been assailed by the appellants primarily on the ground that they had already filed objections in the matter which required final
consideration by the writ Court. It is contended that, instead of adjudicating the writ petition finally, the writ Court directed the appellants herein to deposit the aforesaid MIR ARIF MANZOOR I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document 29.04.26
amount, which, according to the appellants, was unwarranted in the facts and circumstances of the case. It is further submitted that the Union Territory is not a private person likely to dispose of its assets or evade its liabilities in the event of an adverse judgment.
03. In view of the aforesaid, the appeal is allowed and the interlocutory order dated 11.02.2026 passed by the writ Court is set aside.
04.
Disposed of along with connected CM(s).
(SANJAY PARIHAR) (SANJEEV KUMAR) JUDGE
JUDGE SRINAGAR: 27.04.2026
“Mir Arif”
MIR ARIF MANZOOR I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document 29.04.26