VIJAY YADAV ALIAS VIJAY PRASAD YADAV v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
A.B.A./1805/2026 · 2026-05-04
Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 8748 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 8748 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 2026:JHHC:13104 )
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A. B. A. No. 1805 of 2026
Vijay Yadav @ Vijay Prasad Yadav, aged about 54 years, son of Chamari Yadav @ Chaman Yadav, resident of village Nagwan, P.O.-Malda, P.S. Gawan, District-Giridih ...... … Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand .…. … Opposite Party
--------
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI For the Petitioner
:Mr. S.K. Murty, Advocate For the State : Mr. Rakesh Kumar Sinha, A.P.P.
02/ 04.05.2026: Heard learned senior counsel for the petitioner and
learned counsel for the State.
2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Gawan P.S. Case No. 68 of 2025, registered under sections 109, 115(2), 118(1), 117(2), 126(2), 74, 75, 303(2), 3(5) of BNS, pending in the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Giridih.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has earlier moved in A.B.A. No.5617 of 2025 which was rejected by order dated
22.09.2025. He further submits that now investigation is under progress and in view of that the present anticipatory bail may kindly be entertained.
4.
Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer and submits that there is no fresh ground in the second anticipatory bail application and earlier anticipatory bail application has been dismissed on merit.
5.
In course of argument no fresh ground has been argued. Earlier anticipatory bail application filed by the petitioner has been rejected on merit. Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is dismissed.
Dt.04.05.2026
( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) satyarthi-