Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8748 (BOM)

USHIK MAHESH GALE AND ORS v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

ABA/2617/2026 · 2026-09-16

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

501-aba2617-26.doc vai IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.2617 OF 2026 Ushik Mahesh Gale & Ors. ...Applicants V/s. State of Maharashtra & Anr. ...Respondents Mr.Rishi Bhuta with Mr.Sameer Tapia, Mr.Pushkraj Deshpande and Mr.Rohan Marathe i/b ALMT Legal for the Applicants. Mr.Bapu V. Holambe Patil, APP for Respondent No.1 – State. CORAM : PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR , J. DATE : 16TH SEPTEMBER , 2026. P.C. :- 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants as well as learned APP for the respondents. 2. By this application under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) the applicants are seeking transit anticipatory bail in connection with FIR No.316 of 2026 registered with Sector 63 Police Station at Commissionerate, Gautam Buddha Nagar in the State of Utter Pradesh. The offences alleged in the FIR against the applicants are under Sections 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2) and 61 of BNS. 3. During arguments, when it was pointed out by the learned APP that the applicants have filed this application directly before this Court and 1/2 VASANT ANANDRAO IDHOL Digitally signed by VASANT ANANDRAO IDHOL Date: 2026.09.17 10:47:38 +0530 501-aba2617-26.doc raised objection on that count, learned counsel for applicant seeks permission to withdraw this application with liberty to file appropriate application for seeking transit anticipatory bail before the Sessions Court at Mumbai. 4. In view of this, the instant application is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. 5. It is however directed that in case the applicants file any application seeking transit anticipatory bail, the Sessions Court shall decide the same at the earliest. (PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, J.) 2/2