Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8746 (PNJ)

KAMLESH DEVI v. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR,

CRM-M/28151/2019 · 2026-02-04

Rupinderjit Chahal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRM-M-28151 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA 307 KAMLESH DEVI STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Present: Mr. for the petitioner. Ms. Aiman J. Chishti, AAG, Punjab Mr. for respondent No.2. RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J. (ORAL) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has since expired, 2. Dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. 04.02.2026 Gurpreet 28151-2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM Date of decision: KAMLESH DEVI Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Mr. Charanji Lal, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Aiman J. Chishti, AAG, Punjab Mr. Gaurav Tyagi, Advocate for respondent No.2. ***** RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has expired, therefore, the present petition has Dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No ii) Whether reportable? Yes/No -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-28151-2019 Date of decision: 04.02.2026 ….Petitioner ....Respondents HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Ms. Aiman J. Chishti, AAG, Punjab. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has , the present petition has been rendered infructuous. Dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. x(RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL) JUDGE i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No - ….Petitioner s Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has (RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL) GURPREET 2026.02.06 09:04 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document.