IRFAN GHULAM HUSSAIN TINWALA v. ISHAQ ABDULLA PARKAR AND ANR
WP/4546/2026 · 2026-09-17
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 8746 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 8746 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
22-23-WP-4545-4546-2026.DOC IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.4545 OF 2026 Irfan Ghulam Hussain Tinwala …Petitioner Versus Ishaq Abdulla Parkar & Anr. …Respondents WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.4546 OF 2026 Irfan Ghulam Hussain Tinwala …Petitioner Versus Ishaq Abdulla Parkar & Anr. …Respondents Mr. Osman Chishty, for the Petitioner in both Writ Petitions. Mr. P. P. Jadhav, APP, for the Respondent-State in Writ Petition No.4545 of 2026. Mr. S. V. Walve, APP, for the Respondent-State in Writ Petition No.4546 of 2026. CORAM:
MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.
DATED :
17th SEPTEMBER 2026 PC:-
1. After arguing the matter for some time, Mr. Chishty, learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner seeks withdrawal of the Writ Petitions, as the Court is not inclined to entertain the Writ Petitions, as a typographical mistake is being used for delaying the cases filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, Page 1 Sonali SONALI MILIND PATIL Digitally signed by SONALI MILIND PATIL Date: 2026.09.17 16:49:26 +0530
22-23-WP-4545-4546-2026.DOC 1881, where the cheque is of Rs.38,70,000,00/- (Rupees Thirty Eight Crores and Seventy Lakhs only).
2. Accordingly, the Writ Petitions are allowed to be withdrawn and disposed of as such.
[MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.] Page 2 Sonali