Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8743 (AP)

Bogasamudrapu Venkata Subbareddy, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/15340/2024 · 2026-08-23

Maheswara Rao Kuncheam

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010304792024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] MONDAY, THE 24th DAY OF AUGUST 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 15340/2024 Between: 1. BOGASAMUDRAPU VENKATA SUBBAREDDY,, S/O.LATE BOGASAMUDRAPU CHINA ERUKULA REDDY, R/O.D.NO.41-21/4-12, KORADA VIJAY KUMAR VEEDHI, BHRAMARAMBHAPURAM, OPPOSITE 6TH TOWN POLICE STATION, KRISHNALANKA, VIJAYAWADA (URBAN), KRISHNA, ANDHRA PRADESH-520013. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, POLICE LINE, TADEPALLI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. THE DIVISIONAL SUPERINTEND OF POLICE, OFFICE OF THE DIVISIONAL SUPERINTEND OF POLICE, TADEPALLI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, TADEPALLI POLICE STATION, TADEPALLI TOWN AND MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 5. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, TADEPALLI POLICE STATION, TADEPALLI TOWN AND MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ Order or direction particularly, one in the nature of a WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the respondent authorities more particularly the 5th respondent in threatening. harassing petitioner and continuously calling him to the Tadepalli Police Station, Guntur District without there being any crime thereby registered against the petitioner and thereby interfering with his personal life and liberty, as illegal, arbitrary and violation of principles of natural justice and also violations of Articles 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere in any manner with the petitioner personal life and liberty otherwise than any known procedure established by law and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to insist the petitioner to appear before their authority nor interfere with petitioner's personal liberty and life otherwise than due procedure established by law, pending disposal of main Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. VENKAT CHALASANI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. VENKAT CHALASANI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 15340 of 2024 The Court made the following Order: Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present Writ Petition with a liberty to work out legal remedies in accordance with the law. 2. Sri P.Ajay Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home expressed no objection for the same. 3. Permission is accorded. 4. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn leaving open to the petitioner to pursue his remedies in terms of law only. Interlocutory applications, if any, pending shall stand closed. ____________________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 24.08.2026 RMR 4 33 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 15340 of 2024 Date: 24.08.2026 RMR