Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 8739 (AP)

R.B.Chandrakala, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/19140/2026 · 2026-08-24

Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010358392026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] TUESDAY, THE 25th DAY OF AUGUST 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 19140/2026 Between: 1. R.B.CHANDRAKALA,, W/O. P.VENKATARAMANA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, R/O. YERRADODDAGARIPALLI, GORANTLAPALLI POST, KV PALLI MANDAL, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH - 522 237. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, , ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT - 516 270 3. THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, SERP, 2ND FLOOR OF THE NTR ADMINISTRATIVE BLOCK AT THE PANDIT NEHRU BUS STATION (PNBS) IN VIJAYAWADA, ANDHRA PRADESH 520 013. 4. THE PROJECT DIRECTOR, DISTRICT RURAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY, VELUGU TIRUPATI, TIRUPATI DISTRICT - 517 501. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, direction, writ, more particularly Writ of Mandamus declaring the proceedings issued by the 4th Respondent in 2 ROC.No.DRDA/HR/16/2022, dated 11.05.2026 suspending the petitioner from the service basing on the news item published in the news paper and without supplying the enquiry report dated 26.03.2026 as illegal, arbitrary and consequently set aside the proceedings issued by the 4th Respondent in ROC.No.DRDA/HR/16/2022, dated 11.05.2026 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the proceedings issued by the 4th Respondent in ROC.No.DRDA/HR/16/2022, dated 11.05.2026 by reinstating the petitioner into service forthwith, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K RAGHU VEER Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR SERVICES I The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.19140 OF 2026 ORDER: Basing upon the letter addressed by the petitioner on 13.08.2026 (part of record), learned counsel for the petitioner filed memo of withdrawal dated 24.08.2026. Accordingly, the matter is listed today under the caption ‘for withdrawal’. 2. No representation on behalf of the petitioner. 3. Basing on the memo of withdrawal dated 24.08.2026, the present Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 25.08.2026 KBN 4 33 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.19140 of 2026 Date: 25.08.2026 KBN